<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would You Agree That Fame Has A Very Huge Downfall These Days?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celebrityslammer.com/2009/08/would-you-agree-that-fame-has-a-very-huge-downfall-these-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celebrityslammer.com/2009/08/would-you-agree-that-fame-has-a-very-huge-downfall-these-days/</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip, Stars behind bars and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:31:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sniper</title>
		<link>http://celebrityslammer.com/2009/08/would-you-agree-that-fame-has-a-very-huge-downfall-these-days/comment-page-1/#comment-8457</link>
		<dc:creator>Sniper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrityslammer.com/2009/08/would-you-agree-that-fame-has-a-very-huge-downfall-these-days/#comment-8457</guid>
		<description>I agree 100% with you on this. Actors now have no privacy, especially A list celebrities. People know where they are at all times. Paparazzi follows them everywhere they go, and if they make a mistake that any of us can commit, it&#039;s front page news. 60 years ago, the paparazzi had less influence on an actors image. Actors were well protected and had less exposure, IMO with the internet, it got a lot worse for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100% with you on this. Actors now have no privacy, especially A list celebrities. People know where they are at all times. Paparazzi follows them everywhere they go, and if they make a mistake that any of us can commit, it&#8217;s front page news. 60 years ago, the paparazzi had less influence on an actors image. Actors were well protected and had less exposure, IMO with the internet, it got a lot worse for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

